Showing posts with label Musings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Musings. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 21, 2019

On Being Catholic in a Non-Catholic World

My darling son is finishing up his school studies for the year and we came across a section in the Appendix of The New St. Joseph Baltimore Catechism 2 that really struck me:

The best way to win non-Catholics was given us by Christ when He said, "By this will all men know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another" (John 13, 35). If non-Catholics see Catholics who are truly kind to one another and are interested in all men, even those outside the Church, even their enemies, even those they do not like, this is bound to make an impression and to encourage them to examine the Catholic Church more carefully. 

If Catholics live like pagans, are kind to their friends, and unkind to those they do not like, then no amount of fine reasons will ever convince non-Catholics that the Catholic Church is really the true Church of Christ. 

What does this mean? We need to define terms here - "love" and "kind" and "interested".
  • Interested: concerned for eternal salvation as defined by Christ 
  • Love: calling names and over-turning tables is not outside the realm of "tough love" as provided by Jesus Christ Himself. 
  • Kind: Sometimes the kindest thing is the Truth, even if it hurts. That certainly doesn't mean "cruel" - I would argue it is more cruel to lie, put on a false face and leave someone in their sin that removes them from eternal salvation. 


Just some ponderings. Nothing fleshed out yet.






Friday, November 29, 2013

The Church - and Labels

I recently came across a blog post about the use of sexual labels and why the Church won't use them. Simple terminology - and it has stuck with me. Almost haunting me.

Why I am Not a Heterosexual

I wonder how much I have been encouraging the use of such labels, leading to the wrong impressions, then to the wrong beliefs, in both myself and others.

In short, we are each made in the image and likeness of God - THAT is our identity. To identify our core selves as anything else diminishes our value in others' eyes to the value of mere parts.

Parts that are not just physical.

No, we don't have to like everything about a person, but we do need to see them as the complete person they are: only in this way, can we overlook those things that we don't like and truly embrace those things we do connect with.

And it goes all directions:

  • A person identifying as gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender - is asking everyone to identify that person for this attraction (it may or may not be a lifestyle for the particular person).

  • A person identifying as heterosexual - is asking to be identified by that attraction.

  • The person who identifies as LGBT - or heterosexual - or non-sexual --- is looking to other people according to that attraction - according to the corresponding "parts" - in this case, usually physical; but their REAL needs are spiritual and emotional, which can only be fulfilled in a "whole" relationship.


Yet just because you are attracted to a particular gender,


does not mean you are attracted to ALL members of that gender.


Or that a deep meaningful (sexually chaste) relationship can't be had with anyone of any gender.


Why are we defining everything by sex anyway?



Because sex is what brings about new life - it created each one of us - and will continue on the human race until the end of time. But we continue to miss the boat when we don't see the WHOLE person, without the labels.

 

Now I understand how a husband and wife can live as brother and sister periodically or for long periods of time; how brothers and sisters can grow up together without these attractions to one another; how I can have such a spiritual connection with men who have (since our friendships started) become priests and not "want" them in "that way" that is natural between a man and a woman - they are truly brothers (and fathers) to me.

Because they love each other as WHOLE PERSONS - BODY AND SOUL - AS AN IMAGE OF GOD.

Not as mere parts.

 

Additional articles/links on the same topic:

Sidon Caesarea Philippi Tiberias Nain Sychar Bethany Ephraim Tyre Bethsaida Cana Caesarea Arimathea Jericho Jerusalem Capernaum Magdala Nazareth Emmaus Bethphage Bethlehem Mt. Carmel Mt. Tabor Mt. Gerizim Mt. Calvary Mt. of Beatitudes


Mt. Nebo Mt. of Olives Mts. of Judea Mts. of Galilee Desert of Judea Mts. of Lebanon Mts. of Samaria Mediterranean Sea Dead Sea Jordan River Sea of Galilee Galilee Samaria Judea Perea

Friday, October 11, 2013

I love you God

 

How often do I say the words "I love you" to the Father, to the Son, to the Holy Spirit - clearly - not just with my actions, but with my actual words? How often do I say the words "I love you" to (the very definition of perfection) God in the way I do to my beloved child, to my nieces, nephews and other beloved children in my life, as I do to most of those (imperfect) persons I love so dearly.

 

Jeremiah 31:3: 


With age-old love I have loved you;

          so I have kept my mercy toward you.

 

Why do the words "I love you" come so easily to my lips with people and not with the the Creator of those people, the One who is within all my loved ones? Is it really so much easier to say 'I love you' to those who touch my cheek, who play with my hair, who have arms to hug me, who smile their baby smiles, who go out of their way to make my bad day wonderful - and not so easy to say I love you to the one who provides these gifts, these graces, who holds me in His arms even as I fail Him again and again? Is it because I can't always feel His arms? Should that matter? He is here, with me - why can I not turn to Him and say, "I love you Father."

Yes the words "I love you" certainly come easier with fallen human persons - sometimes too easily. There are some loved ones to whom I can never say those words because it could be misconstrued in our society we live in. So very heart-wrenching to shake hands and look in the eyes and pray they know my purest love; the words are there and the tongue is bitten to hold them back. Forced holding back for imperfect but lovable humans - because the words come so easily.

 

So much difficulty saying in words what my imperfect actions attempt to say to the Perfect One. Why do the words not come so easily with God?

 

What blockage is in my branch of the Vine?

 

Psalm 18: 2-3:

I love you, LORD,

    my strength,

LORD,

   my rock,

     my fortress,

       my deliverer,

         My God,

           my rock of refuge,

             my shield,

               my saving horn,

                  my stronghold!

I love you, LORD!

 

 

Monday, September 30, 2013

Long Hair - What to do!?

 

The other evening, I had lovely young lady visiting who, of late, has developed a rather strong attraction to my hair - wrapping herself up in it, covering her face in it, hiding under it - being silly with my headcovering. She has been growing out her own hair long - she started long before she met me.

 

So the other evening, I am pretending to have an adult conversation with this young lady's father and she is playing with my hair - twisting it into one rope, then multiple ropes, wrapping it around my face, around my head, looped with my glasses - I kept having this image of Princess Leia and Padme on a bad hair day (did either ever have one???). Lots of fun! I truly enjoyed having her play with my hair. As she played with my hair, I realized just how long it is - finally, I can call it "long" (I've been able to sit on it for several months now - but to SEE it stretched out so far from my body or to have it go around my head that many times - yeah, it's long ;) )

My own son loved playing with my hair until somewhere around age 7 - at age 8, he maybe played with it a couple of times - and now, at 9, nothing. I am sad to consider those days might be over. He would take the ends of my braids and flip the ends of my hair around his finger; he would wrap up his hands and arms in my braid; he split the hanging part below the braid to make a "rainbow" as he called it. He always preferred it braided to hanging and rarely did anything involving my face (we have a largely unspoken rule that I do not like things in my face). He loved laying on the floor as a baby and toddler having the edges of my ankle-length skirts or my hair brushed over his face though!

I was thinking of all of this just now when I recalled a small number of ladies (with very short hair) tell me that they have short hair because you can't do anything with long hair. For the record I never asked them or brought up that topic - this was very clearly a defense about something they didn't feel right about - they felt the need to defend their decision to me when I wasn't attacking or even cared!

One such lady stands out. We traveled to Italy together many years ago and shared lodging throughout the trip. She couldn't STAND the fact that I would wake up 5 minutes before we are supposed to be out the door, with a 1 year old boy in tow, and I would still make it to breakfast on time. She was a single woman with no children - so she didn't understand the amount of preparedness that went into assuring those few precious minutes of sleep. As the mother of a child who is still a morning sleeper and a night owl, I had already learned how to catch a few extra winks: bathe/shower in the eveninghave the next day's clothes ready and laid out for both of us; fresh diaper and travel toilet rim ready to go; all items needed for the next day in the backpack (snacks, water bottles, camera, diapers, wallet). Mission: sleep when I can; think as little as possible right after waking. Result: Get up, use toilet, have child use toilet while doing own hair, wash hands and face, do hair, get both of us dressed, gather up our things, load into car and meet everyone for breakfast. Come back up just to brush teeth. Good to go. Mission Accomplished.

Yes, waist-length hair, 1 year old boy - it can all be done in a 5 minute morning routine. (keeping in mind that breakfast and tooth-brushing is separate)

 

And how does this relate to hair? 

I didn't have to wash it every morning to get it to stay in place - I wash my hair once or twice a week because it is actually healthier to get all the natural oils into it before washing it with harsh chemicals (I alternate between the least troublesome of the chemicals and natural methods)

I didn't have to blow-dry it - it air-dries without doing too many strange things - probably because of the weight?

I didn't have to curl it - the short sections wave themselves in a natural manner; the longer sections get braided, twisted, roped, tied, looped, banded, pony/pig-tailed - and a thousand varieties on each of those.

One morning, after this woman had been particularly cranky with me for sleeping through her hour-long process of getting herself ready, she told me that my simple braids are proof that I can do nothing with my hair - but look at all SHE can do with HER hair. I just looked at her and quietly said, "You wash it and curl it the same every morning. That is a lot of care, but that is not a lot that can be DONE. You do NOT need to defend yourself to me. It is YOUR hair and YOUR choice." I walked out of the room.

But it was my catty side of the month - and I was still a bit immature at the time. That evening I did a different hairstyle (took me 90 seconds); in the following days I did my hair twice each day - in a completely different hairstyle. Each one took me less than two full minutes - so quick that the process was almost never seen.

 

What CAN'T I do with long hair? In my own hair, I can't expect curling iron curls to stay for more than a few hours - but that is my hair short OR long (I have had hair as short as just under my ears before - in a boy-ish cut - so I do know what can/can't be done with short/long hair).

I definitely can't expect everyone to appreciate the fact that I choose the "traditional" feminine look because it fulfills the truest, deepest core of my nature.

I can't stay in hiding - long hair stands out in the society in which I live.

I can't think that the evil one will leave me alone - or that God will shield me from all attacks as my Faith in Him is tested.

But I don't think that is what people think of when they say, "you can't do anything with long hair".

[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="300"] On a "do-nothing" day - or perhaps I had just gotten up and was working at home for the morning - since my headcovering isn't on yet. Legoboy secretly took this photo on a spy mission of his.[/caption]

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Reality Check

I've seen other bloggers choosing a word for 2013.



My word: REALITY.



Reality is that the Proverbs 31 woman had a husband (who sat around chatting with the other man at the water-gate, which is a topic for a different blog post!).



Working from home has HUGE blessings.



And many, many curses.



The worst curse? Everyone expects that because you're at home you can do literally EVERYTHING.



Homeschool the child.

Prepare all meals from scratch.

Keep the kitchen spic and span.

Keep the living room clutter-free.

All the bedrooms are beautiful.

The bathroom SPARKLES.

You are available any time noon or night to take every phone call and respond to EVERY e-mail within 5 minutes.

And you can't possibly have a degree in business management so you need to take every piece of advice that comes your way from each customer who "realizes" that you have an at-home business and thus must NEED business advice.

Let's not discuss the balcony.

Or the inside of the car.

And I must have the perfect schedule for my child's sleep and waking.

Did I mention 24/7 availability, because hey - I'm sitting at home all day with nothing to do.



Nope. What I NEED is a reality-check.

Look, I set myself up for it - I did it. No-one MADE me open two in-home businesses (I couldn't find suitable employment and where I live now, I can't do full-time daycare in my home). No-one made me choose to work at home (I couldn't find suitable out of the home employment). No-one made me be a single mom (I could have given him up for adoption - and I prayed about that - for six long months). No-one made me homeschool (but I tell you what - considering our lives right now - it's a GOOD thing we do! If he had to follow the school schedule, there would go the few blessings we have left). No-one made me accumulate the amount of school-debt I have (I let myself be deluded into the myth of "justifiable debt" - I didn't have to fall for it).



So here we are. Having the roughest day of the year thus far.



I need to spend time on some projects that will be great long-term income; but I have the short-term income to cover first.

I'd refund everyone's orders and just focus on those long-term projects, but then we couldn't pay our rent (due tomorrow) or the utilities (due tomorrow) or the phone and electricity (due Monday).



Reality is that we DO make food from scratch, because it is healthier and we do it together - it FORCES me to spend time with my son doing something healthy and productive.
Reality is we don't have ample outdoor space for as much gardening as we want, so the homemade food gets our hands "into the earth" and keeps me grounded.



Reality is that I'm happy if everything is sanitary (it usually is). I would love no clutter, but then I'd have to take away my son's free-will. And probably my own.



Reality is that I DO have a minor in business management and I know the mistakes I am making - and they are NOT the ones that people are giving me advice on. Sorry. I know you all are trying to be SO helpful, but it can stop now. It only slows me down. And you want your products.



Reality is that all these people say, "If you'd only asked for help, I'd've SO been there!" And I've been asking for help. For 20 years. I'm not saying I've had none. I have certainly been blessed in many, many ways. But if I hear that line ONE MORE TIME, I will honestly, probably scream. I'm that over-the-edge about it. I've been asking. Pleading. And all I get are accusations when I say or do something that makes someone uncomfortable. How dare I state the truth because it makes someone uncomfortable!?



REALITY.

Our home must be maintained.

We must get moved into a real house.

We need outdoor time every day.

I CAN ONLY DO SO MUCH.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The chores will be done by me and my son at the appropriate times (as in not put off until tomorrow if it should have been done today), even if it means doing them until we are bone-tired and can't yet go to bed because they didn't get done when they should have. Lesson learned: nothing necessary gets put off.

Strict work hours. No "over-time". No rush orders.

Set time everyday to work on those long-term income projects.

The computer is turned OFF at least 12 hours a day. And during the 12 hours of on-time, e-mail is turned off for at least half of every hour I'm actually ON the machine. That means decreased response time for Keys of the Universe, but it also means higher production efficiency and higher likelihood of finishing promised projects. My sanity comes first. Once balance is restored, the computer can be on in the background again. Background. Dings with a new message.





I have spent my entire childhood and adulthood thus far biding time. Putting in the hours. I'm burned. I can't even say I'm tired, because I don't know what it means to NOT be tired. I care so much that I am caring myself right out of existence.



Reality.



Reality is that God loves each one of us anyway. He loves me. Even when I feel so utterly unlovable and undeserving.



May I strive to remember that fact always in the coming year. And let HIM be the one in charge of my life.



Thursday, December 27, 2012

Homeschooling and Personality

Interesting experience several months back. Tae-kwon-do tournament - Legoboy was testing for the next belt up; the instructor had separated out the white and yellow stripes to a different test day, so Legoboy only had one other person testing below him; everyone else was above him. The other girl was testing for green belt and entrance onto STORM team (Special Team of Role Models - intended for students up to age 18, with higher expectations of behavior and well, being a role model ;) - the standards are HIGH). Legoboy was already on the STORM team and testing for the next higher belt.

There were a few white belts and yellow stripes at the test just to watch. They look up to these higher belts.

This post has two parts - they are inter-related. Bear with me for a moment ;)

All was going well, for the most part. Those two youngest-children-lowest-belts-testing both have some "attitude" issues to work out, hopefully during their childhoods so they don't have to deal with it as adults. The instructor/master got after them both, publicly; because they are now role models and it needed to be made clear 1) where the bar is placed if you're going to be on STORM team; 2) those lower belts are watching and need to know what behavior is acceptable to copy; and 3) their display of negative behavior was public and at least once for each of them directly affected the test results of someone else.

Before anyone gets riled up about a public chewing out - please note these facts:

  • the TKD master has been at this for 20-or-so years. The combined years of all instructors present was well over 100 years. They have turned around children with SEVERE behavior issues (far beyond anything displayed on that test day); and even had a child with severe ADHD and allergic to all medications for it. They KNOW what they are doing. They are NOT ripping these kids apart.

  • The higher belts - they messed up too. And they got their own chewing outs, as well as the push-ups. In front of everyone. You mess up in front of everyone, you're doing push-ups. Period.

  • It's not like "everyone look over here while I give this kid push-ups and everyone stare at him until he does them all" - NO! It's in a very busy place, with a LOT going on. A FEW people might be watching at any moment; but we all know those lower belts eyes were everywhere taking everything in.


During this particular test, a lady came in a bit late and sat with a friend of hers in the "audience". They chatted a bit, then I heard the new lady say, "Wow, there are a lot of homeschoolers here." The lady who had already been there said, "Really!? How do you know?"

"Oh, I can spot them a mile away!"

(inwardly I'm groaning - this is going to be one of those "homeschoolers have no social skills, are social recluses, thus they stand out like a sore thumb" and I started to slide away (I was sitting on the floor videotaping key moments of the test for various people) - but I couldn't get away fast enough before hearing more - I'm glad I got stuck ;) ).

She started to identify each and every homeschooler present at the test (I know several homeschooling students weren't there as they weren't testing that day). Every. Single. One. Including the ones with "perfect behavior and social skills."

Wow. I stuck around to hear more.

She explained that there is a confidence about those who homeschool - an inner peace that exudes outward, even through their particular personalities which can't be affected by the type of schooling they have (HER words! not mine! Wish they were mine!).

Interestingly enough, my son and the other girl noted above have some similar issues; and they both had "addresses" during the testing. Yet, my son stood out as the homeschooler and the girl stood out as the public schooler.

INTERESTING SIDE NOTE: She did not, at that time, see any of these children interact with their parents. All parents were in the "audience" and it was not clear who belonged to who. The students interacted amongst themselves and with the instructors present.

During a break in filming, I approached her and asked if she could give me specific points about each child that made her say "homeschool" or "traditional school" (she didn't differentiate between private or public schooling). She admitted to me that the only time she got the homeschool label wrong was if a child attended very good private schools that use multi-age grouping in its various forms (Montessori, Waldorf, etc.). Otherwise she couldn't really pinpoint just too much as much as just read her instinct.

She reiterated the inner confidence that is a very different confidence from those who attend most public schools. She mentioned a particular type of innocence that can't seem to be breached no matter what goes on in life.

She said that there is something about the conversation style, mannerisms during interactions, that are very different between the two groups.

And, not knowing which child was mine, she quickly pointed out she was not judging either group - just had this innate ability to separate them out from one another.
So I did ask about the two youngest. "How do you know? They are so similar."

The girl is hard, she said. Layers of hardness. There is a bitterness in her, but she wants to be loved - she knows she is loved, but her needs are so great that she is protecting herself. She probably has to protect herself at school because she has low real confidence in herself, thus she has become hard. It seems this tae-kwon-do program will be good for her and she will likely pull out of her current state, in time, with lots of support and maintenance of standards such as I see here. She has trouble with authority except when its getting after her. She probably has a mom and a dad at home or at least both are a consistent part of her life, but she doesn't spend as much time with them.

The boy is crusty. He has been hurt and is in need. I presume he has no father at home because of the way he looks to all the older boys and the adult men with such focus; he has other signs of paternal abandonment. I see him discerning which men to look to and which he ignores. This tells me he does have a strong man in his life and he is seeking those characteristics in others. Yet, he has that sense of innocence and that sense of confidence I mentioned that go hand in hand with one another - a confidence in his own value, thus a maintenance of innocence.

(she didn't know that Legoboy has several strong men in his life, but close enough!)

She also said something about each one responded to being reprimanded - their styles and mannerisms; but now, several months later, I can't quite re-capture the same words she used. My own observations: the girl pouts and stops trying until an attempt is insisted upon; Legoboy argues insisting he is right even after proven wrong, then does it the right way and keeps quiet, only later apologizing but never in the moment.

So. I asked her about socialization. What she thought about it. She said the important thing is to have true self-confidence in one's own value, not pumped up, not artificial, not over-protected, but a balanced and real life. She saw that all the TKD students present that day had a proper self-confidence - regardless of their schooling; but there was always something different about how each group interacted with each other and respected their authorities.

So do homeschoolers need more or different socialization, I asked. Is there anyone here who homeschools, who stands out as needing a change of scenery or are being inappropriately schooled?
All of them here have got it right, she responded.


Sunday, December 23, 2012

Not Quite Christmas

It is not quite Christmas and I have a hard time believing it.

Advent slipped away. Amidst what? Not the shopping (I've bought groceries once this past month and all gifts this year are home-made or already purchased); not the parties (we really minimize those - just one thus far - all others will be during the Christmas season); not the decorating (we decorate on Christmas eve).

Amidst the vitriolic words directly towards others, including myself. Amidst reading and hearing about the evil attitudes of people in the stores. Amidst the job losses. Amidst hearing stories of consumerism. Amidst the stories of mental illness and the sufferings of families.

It doesn't feel like Christmas. Perhaps this was what the first Christmas felt like: a world in need of a Savior.

A world filled with bitterness. Filled with accusations against another's morality. A world filled with lack of understanding; lack of trying to understand. A world devoid of peace and goodwill towards one's neighbor.

And these things coming from Christians.

If that is how non-Christians see Christians, no wonder they would rather stay away. Far away.

No wonder they laugh at us for saying "Jesus is the reason for the season" as they put up signs saying, "Use reason for the season!" implying that Jesus could not be what we claim Him to be.

Because we can't even get His teachings right. How could we possibly get right an understanding of His birth? And death? and resurrection?

Something to ponder next time one is tempted to call into question a stranger's 'Christianity'. Are we judging splinters through our planks?

So yes. Perhaps it does feel like Christmas. A world filled with disbelief. Then, just a few months after that first Christmas, innocent children were slaughtered in the name of murdering a newborn King.

Perhaps it is time to prepare for the coming of Jesus into our own hearts. Our own stony, cold hearts. That is what Advent was supposed to be about. Is supposed to be about. Preparation for His coming - not the first time; but the second time - the Parousia. When God will be all in all.

Prepare our hearts to receive Him - all of Him, in all of us.

It begins NOW.

It is not quite Christmas. Christ is not quite present.

Can we make it happen? Can we be ready for Him?

Only then, can it truly be Christmas.

It begins NOW.

Thursday, December 13, 2012

Morning Fatigue

It is rare these days for me to wake up fatigued and stumbling, waiting some burst of energy to wake me up after I'm woken up.

I remember those days in elementary school, middle school, high school, college, my son's early infancy.

Then we lived in Central Time Zone for a year - and something clicked. I was actually WAKING up, withOUT an alarm clock, every morning and still getting to my son's school on time to work the mornings then to my training center in the afternoons. Something about that time zone was so helpful. Or maybe it is was because we were so far north - the days and nights were much more extreme. I don't know, but it was nice.

So I decided to go without alarm clocks.

I can't explain it but for the most part I can wake up timely, not rush around but BE awake.

I don't need make-up to hide the bags under the eyes and I am mostly well-refreshed.

If I have to be up by a particular time that I don't think I'll manage, I set the alarm on my phone. Thus, alarms happen rare enough I actually wake to them (I stopped waking to them for a LONG time).

Well, a couple of Saturdays back I'd been up too late the night before working and had to be up early. For tae-kwon-do tournament no less - all the noise, all the driving in the early morning winter air. Sigh. I said to myself, "I don't have to do this again for a while."

So last night I stayed up late - got a second and third wind and really slammed through some intense, detailed projects. I am SO RELIEVED to have these projects out of the way! I have SO MUCH ELSE to catch up on! I thought for sure i'd sleep until 10:30 since I was going to bed at 4:30 after having been awake all day and most of the night.

I woke up at 7:30 and could NOT get back to sleep.

I am awake. But I am unproductive. I am bleary-eyed. I have bags under my eyes. I can't function, yet I can't go to sleep.

So I pray. I pray for sleep to overtake me. As I feel that familiar wave of energy seep into me that I remember so well from my school days. I hated it then. I hate it now. This being SO tired and waking up after waking up. It's not proper.

But neither is staying up until 4:30! Which will be a repeat tonight, if I don't fall asleep in the middle: THE HOBBIT comes out tonight and my son has been saving up money for a year. So despite our current financial straits, we are treating his godfather to a midnight showing.

I sense an afternoon nap coming on!

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Montessori and Original Sin

One day, I gathered all my notes to write something about Montessori and Catholicism - specifically Original Sin, since this seems to be a huge sticking point - if Montessori sees only the good in a child, what about Original Sin? And what about "breaking the will"? And how could we dare just "follow the child" because their errant ways will only lead to more errant ways if they have complete freedom!

Well, besides issues of the balance of freedom and responsibility which is inherent in all properly Montessori environments, and the fact that we follow the child only within a prepared environment full of only good choices, I might mention that Montessori emphasizes time and again that when once a negative action or behavior shows itself we nip in the bud - no warnings, no 1-2-3-Magic, no "reasoning" with the 3 year old. But no strict harsh punishments either - we simply stop the behavior and move on. Don't LET those bad habits develop! As the child ages, more reasoning can occur, but by then, the child has been formed in many good habits and the negative things that come up can be dealt with as they happen. Anyone who says that a young child cannot then possibly reveal anything beautiful and holy to us adults, is not obeying the Lord's words, "Let the little children come to me, for heaven belongs to such as them." Hm. Original Sin. Yet heaven belongs to the children, not to adults.



But someone else has said all of this so much better than I could! In googling to find more information and supportive documentation, I found the following site (please visit to read the full article) and I LOVE this paragraph in particular:
http://www.catholic.net/index.php?option=dedestaca&id=3541

Montessori held and applied the Catholic teaching that man was not completely corrupt with the Fall. She said that "in spite of the moral disorder brought about by original sin, there still remains in human nature a great potentiality for goodness." Montessori used the analogy of wheat in the field to make a point about the natural goodness latent in all children. (51) Inferior wheat plant can grow in the fields without cultivation. Destroying them does not guarantee a good harvest. If the good wheat is to grow it must be cultivated and if it is, the inferior wheat seed will not be able to grow. Montessori says: "The key to the problem is, therefore, not to destroy evil but to cultivate good." (53) Thus allowing the roots of good to sprout in the child´s soul.

And there are all of her own writings - if you read them in full context, they explain themselves! Be sure to look for older publications as somewhere in the 60s, many of her books were re-printed with huge religious sections removed. So newer printings have been heavily secularized.

........................................................
And then I found these:

http://www.nsmontessori.com/NSMCH2.htm

To ignore the child’s spiritual nature is to ignore the very essence and purpose of education.

It is important, in this light, to make Dr. Montessori’s understanding of the nature of the child clear.  She considered the child to be good, but broken.  The child is good in that he is created to be good, and broken in that he is subject to the effects of Original Sin – as St. Paul lamented in his own behavior - not doing the things he wants to do and doing the things he does not want to do.  Her method, she believed, removed many of the obstacles that result in frustration which causes children to lose focus on learning and therefore display ‘broken’ behavior.  By freeing the child from these frustrating obstacles, the child becomes able to develop naturally and normally as God had planned.  This process she called ‘normalization’.

“Experience has shown that normalization causes the disappearance of many childish traits, not only those which are considered to be defects but also others which are generally thought to be virtues...  The disappearance of these childish characteristics shows that the true nature of a child has hitherto not been understood.  The universality of this fact is striking, but not entirely new since from the earliest times a twofold nature has been recognized in man.  The first was given him at the time of his creation.  The second came as a consequence of his first sin, a violation of God’s law.  Because of the fall, man was deprived of the blessings of his earlier state and left to the mercy of his surroundings and the illusions of his own mind.  This doctrine of original sin can help us understand what happens to a child.”(3)

http://www2.talbot.edu/ce20/educators/view.cfm?n=maria_montessori

(an article about the development of her spirituality)

Montessori in 1948 is reported to have lectured in London where she stated:

I see it-this Original Sin-who would not see a thing so evident? In the depths of the human soul is the possibility of continuous decadence…In fact, there are innate tendencies in man's soul which lead to maladies of the spirit sometimes even unknown to ourselves, just as the germs of disease may work silently, and unknown. This is the death of the spirit which brings insensibility with it. These tendencies come from the soul itself and not from the environment

Thursday, November 22, 2012

Happy Thanksgiving!

Happy Thanksgiving everyone!

[caption id="attachment_973" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="Thanksgiving Prayer Table"][/caption]

We woke this morning to a simple morning prayer, introductory prayers to the Rosary, long Scripture readings and a prayer to keep us humble and meek. Especially as we go into a season of the gimmes and gottahaves and justgottagetsforsomeoneelses. Gift giving is wonderful, except when it encourages pride in the best gift given - my own temptation every year, thus every year I force myself to give simple gifts. Serious pride issues.

Saturday, November 3, 2012

FlyLady and Catholic Hearts

Well... several years later, I have some updates....

First, several years ago, I tell in love with FlyLady. I knew there were areas we couldn't agree - and gray areas as well. But I worked it out. Instead of 5 areas of the house, I have 4 (I hve a much smaller home - and I look forward to those 4 weeks each year that are the "fifth week of the month" ;) Freebies!

The shoes thing.... It has always irked me. To no end. I couldn't just disagree and call it good. I think it is a rotten idea!

http://www.flylady.net/d/getting-started/fly-faq/#shoes

Based on her reasoning, the only reason I as a stay at home mom would want to keep my shoes OFF is because "only the kids will see me".

(please note when reading this list, when I first found FlyLady I was doing an in-home daycare)

Well..... I keep my shoes OFF at home for the following reasons:

  • so I can feel like I am at HOME.

  • so no gunk is being tracked in for babies to crawl through

  • so I can BE on the floor with the children

  • so the children can spread out a blanket and nap on the floor

  • so my overnight children can roll off their mats onto the floor and be on clean carpet

  • so I can keep my carpets cleaner - less time and money spent on cleaning (isn't this why I was doing FlyLady to begin with !?)


Ok, indoor shoes might work - then change to outdoor shoes.

Or not:

  • baby fingers on the floor - crawling - playing

  • with no shoes on at all, I can feel the carpet, I can feel the small items that fall and might choke a child, I will feel a baby's finger before stepping on it just too hard (yes, I should see the baby as well, but there ARE fast babies - and if I am carrying one across the room in a hurry (leaking diaper, vomiting baby), well, there just ARE situations where you see the baby but not the fingers.

  • I am a calmer, more relaxed person without shoes on. I am at home. I am WITH the PEOPLE.


She also uses the reasoning about being a professional. Professional swimmers don't wear shoes when doing their jobs ;) Jokes aside, I am a mom, not a professional. I am ok with dressing neatly, brushing the hair (I don't wear make-up, even in truly professional situations, so I won't do it at home), always being ready to greet someone at the door - those things I am good with.

But I don't want shoes in my home. And for those people who stop by just for a few minutes so don't want to take shoes off? Well, it's those first few minutes when the most gunk falls off your shoes onto my carpeting and flooring - and I have the most cleaning up to do when you leave.

That is not me being mean or rude or obnoxious or controlling. That is me being realistic and asking for a little respect in my own home. I have only ever had issues with four people: a firemen who had to do a safety inspection for daycare purposes and the daycare inspection lady (both of whom put plastic bags over their shoes while walking ; my son's godmother (go figure - we love you anyway!); and the man I was courting for a year and a half (he was so used to wearing his shoes non-stop in his own home because of having a cat that vomited and pooped EVERYwhere) - and while he tried SO hard to be mindful of my requests, habits over-ride. And stuff was brought INto my home FROM his home via everyone's shoes that I won't even describe here. Ew.

Sorry FlyLady. No shoes in this home!

(and yes, when I can get away with it - no shoes OUTside either! ;) Easier to clean off feet before coming in, than it is shoes)

Sunday, October 7, 2012

Mean Mommy ;)

Yep. I'm a mean mommy.

If by "mean mommy", one uses the definition: a mother who holds true to her personal principles and strives to raise a child into an independent adult.

Note that this definition does not pass judgment on any other mother, or father for that matter, in any way, shape or form. This definition simply says that in this fallen world of imperfect human beings, each parent strives to their best job raising the child(ren) entrusted to said parent, in the best way that they can.

I personally would not want to raise a child based on principles I don't believe in. And I would RARELY judge another parent for choosing to raise a child according to their own principles, which may be wildly different from mine. The exceptions: physical and emotional safety. If you're going to beat your child and lock him in a closet for days on end - yeah, I'll judge. I can be totally honest about that.

If you raise your child eating ice cream for breakfast - I'll buy the ice cream on my way to your house for a morning play date! Because that is YOUR choice as a parent! (ok, in that case, it happens to be mine too - Saturday morning ice cream is something of a tradition around here - but let's see... if you choose to raise your child in a home where all the children have the same first name (Foreman family comes to mind) or the same first initial (Duggars) - that's up to you!  I won't be going there, because that's not my place.

You want to send your child to a particular school, or not, or unschool or not, or homeschool or not - or do some funky combination of all sorts of schooling. Have at it!

But I am a mean mommy. Why? Because of an arrangement my son and I agreed upon. I shared this agreement on Facebook and received some borderline hate mail. All private thus far, but really!? Why!?

It comes down to finances. On principle, I do not believe in a free-ride in life, despite anything a particular extended family member might have to say about me. I do believe in love/charity and making oneself a gift to others - but a gift to others does not equal a doormat, and when children are involved, the best time to learn responsibility is from a young age. That does NOT mean slave labor, folks! It does not mean "no fun!"

It means that I provide all the necessities (true necessities!) of life, plus a lot of the "wants" (some Americans consider these "wants" as "necessities" and that is where the "mean mommy" syndrome comes in):

Necessities:

  • routine healthy meals, appropriate clothing to the season and age, suitable shelter

  • education and educational supplies for core subjects, which includes basic art


Wants/Extras:

  • enrollment in "electives" - extra educational options that are directly related to the core subjects or ones that I deem as "required" in our household - more art is included here

  • lots and lots of books - reading material for the fun of it, as well as educational options

  • Netflix and similar services - both for fun and for education

  • daily desserts and treats that are not so healthy ;)

  • transportation to/from scheduled events (tae-kwon-do class 2-4 times a week, speech class, tournaments, belt tests, playdates, museum trips, lego store monthly builds, home depot kids workshop monthly - just to name a very scant few)

  • use of digital camera and video camera

  • use of the computer to play a browser-based history game


So the rest of the mean mommy???? My son and I have agreed that HE has to pay for the following:

  • any and all treats above and beyond what I would ordinarily provide - we do a lot of food-related mystery shopping and I like my treats too - so it's not like he is deprived in *any* way of routine junk food!

  • he pays for almost all lego purchases from his own money (he also receives gifts from me and from others on birthdays and christmases) - this "gift" and "earn" mentality has led to him being quite generous with gift-giving. He saves his money and initiates conversations with people - "So if you could have anything for Christmas, what would it be?" and he does what he can to make it happen! You should see his gift-giving list just for this year alone! It is HUGE. Much longer than what he is asking for!

  • Desired purchases that do not fit our household budget. His first big purchase? Lord of the Rings Extended Edition DVDs. At $75, we couldn't afford them, when we had a perfectly good set of widescreen editions. So he saved up his money; and bought them. When we went to order them online, the price had dropped to $49 - so he had an extra $26 to put towards his next purchase: Kingdom Lego sets. That was 2 years ago. Those are still valued items for him and he has set up longer and longer term goals for himself.

  • Tae-kwon-do tournaments. Half the tae-kwon-do belt test fees. Keep in mind, I pay for a uniform each year (all he needs, although this year joining STORM team, means an extra uniform due to the change in color); I drive him to every event; I provide services for the fundraisers and make sure all is in place for his continued practice and growth. I pay for his YMCA membership and his godfather covered the tae-kwon-do class fee itself. So the extra fees are not all bad for a young man to cover.


And we still have a house full of STUFF. Yick. So he's not lacking in good old American consumerism! Despite my mad attempts to the contrary!

He takes on odd jobs with family and neighbors; he works on projects for me; he receives birthday and Christmas money; he helps to sell items that are useful to someone else but not needed here.

He just seems to be growing into a strong spirit of working hard and sharing the fruits of his work with others - because he CAN; because the work and therefore the fruits are truly HIS to *truly* give to others. Yes, he comes to me for guidance (he IS 8 years old after all!), but for the most part, he is free to share his fruits - instead of hording it all for himself because mommy gave it to HIM and him alone; or because "I know I can get more, so I don't care if I give it away." He gives because he has true ownership. He only asks for something from others when he hopes to have something to give in return. He is empowered to know he CAN work, that his work is valuable, and that he can take care of business.

If I am waffling on a purchase for his schooling or for fun and saying "well, I'd be willing to pay x-amount, but the price is y-amount", he calculates the difference himself and if he wants whatever the item is, he brings me the difference and covers it. I never ask for that!  Most recently, that happened with a museum center membership. Turns out, I got an educator discount so I returned the money he offered me, but he was still wanting to let me keep it anyway, towards the membership, just to be of help to me. I did give it back anyway, and he re-distributed the money back into other goals.

I did not teach him those things. I take no credit. I do take credit for working WITH him.

Yep. Mean Mommy. If that is defined as all of the above, OK, you've caught me ;)

Monday, September 24, 2012

Remain In Me

[caption id="" align="alignright" width="300" caption="Eastern Orthodox of as the True Vine. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)"]Eastern Orthodox Image of Christ as the True Vine.[/caption]

Jesus said, "Remain in Me." It said many times within one sitting (the Parable of the True Vine), but He also said it with His actions and other teachings.
He gave us many ways to remain in Him - the most obvious being in the Sacraments, the prime sacrament being the Eucharist and also in Reconciliation.

But how does it work? Really?

In the level 1 Catechesis of the Good Shepherd atrium, for the 3-6 year old children, we focus on the Parable of the Good Shepherd - the Good Shepherd who knows our names, loves us - we are in relationship with Him. That is enough. That is more than we need.

In level 2, we work with the True Vine parable, and the history of the Kingdom of God materials. The children come to realize there is a response to this relationship: Remain in Me. And they explore the ways that we simply remain with Christ.

In level 3 the children are coming to awareness of their place in the Kingdom, not just as a gift to enjoy, but as something for which they are responsible. NOW we start asking, "How shall you remain in Him? And how shall you fill your blank page (the part of the story of the Kingdom of the God that is only just now being written in our lives and in our world right NOW)?"
Then they enter into adolescence with the tools they need to make confident choices in their lives.

[caption id="" align="alignright" width="182" caption="The Good Shepherd, c. 300, at the Pio Cristiano Museum, Rome (Photo credit: Wikipedia)"]The Good Shepherd, c. 300, at the Pio Cristian...[/caption]

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Rest on the 7th Day

I have some thoughts to get out of my head and heart before they burn me up completely:

The Lord said to work for 6 days and rest on the 7th day, correlating with His work of creation. This corresponds to Sunday through Friday for work and Saturday (yes Saturday!) for rest.

Then Jesus Christ resurrected on the 8th day. Even HE rested on the 7th day!! (ok border-line sacrilegious, but come on, it's true!)

Ok, Sunday is both the first day and the last day. Fine.

The Apostle directs us to set aside that day of Resurrection (Sunday) as a day for the Lord. The Lord's Day. "Sun" day (God gave us the sun to give us life; He gave His Son to give us Life - works in English anyway ;) they used to be the same word in Old English, but I digress).

That gives us Saturday for bodily rest and Sunday for giving to the Lord. That means that YES, you can "work" on Sunday: work directly for the Lord. The rest of your week should be for Him too, but Sunday should be very direct and obvious (prayer, Bible, church, liturgy, religious education, faith formation).

The thing that burns me is the people who DO NOT WORK DURING THE WEEK AT ALL - or MINIMALLY. Then suddenly, it's Sunday and "I can't work because it's Sunday."

HUH!!? God EARNED His day to rest (as if He needs to earn anything, the life-giver that He is, He can do what He wants). That is SATURDAY. It does not mean laziness - it means physical rest - refreshment. Do not worry about providing food yourselves (Israelites in the Desert could not collect Manna on this day).

And Sunday is a day FOR THE LORD. Not for YOU. It is your offering back to HIM.
Saturday is HIS gift to YOU for WORKING. Sunday is HIS day that you give back to Him in THANKSGIVING.

And if you don't earn a privilege, you can't DEMAND it. Don't collect your manna during the week, you don't get it on Saturday - or Sunday!

Stepping down from the soapbox now.

Sunday, September 9, 2012

Wishing to be sick !?

On Saturday, I was feeling so psychologically tired (should have been a sign I was getting sick), that I actually wished to be sick. Yep. I really wanted to be sick. Just so I could have an excuse to lay in bed all day. Because I knew I wouldn't do it unless I were forced to - there is just too much work to do right now to lay around. Even if God gave us a day a week for total rest, I need something more (!?) to justify it. Go figure.

Well... as the saying goes.

Be careful what you wish for.

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Out of chocolate syrup...

When you're out of homemade, HFCS-free homemade chocolate syrup, but you need a fix for your ice cream....

one spoon of sugar...

one spoon of powdered cocoa...

and a few drops of vanilla...

Add the ice cream.

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM................................

;)

(notice the lack of photo of the ice cream! It's GONE!)

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Response to Anti-Homeschooling Rant

The person who wrote the following article is running for a political position in Virginia, and this article has been resurrected.

It was originally posted here: Teacher, Revised

There is a follow-up post on the site, but it does not change the following article in the slightest.

My response for our personal situation is inserted in italics between each listing.

The case against homeschooling




By JESSE SCACCIA

Homeschooling: great for self-aggrandizing, society-phobic mother…… but not quite so good for the kid.

Interesting. I homeschool because it IS the best thing for my child.




Here are my top ten reasons why homeschooling parents are doing the wrong thing:

10. “You were totally home schooled” is an insult college kids use when mocking the geeky kid in the dorm (whether or not the offender was home schooled or not). And… say what you will… but it doesn’t feel nice to be considered an outsider, a natural outcropping of being homeschooled.

Other insults include calling someone a Jew, a nigga, gay, preppy, slut wannabe, ghetto-trash, mama's boy, low-life, beached whale - and that's what I remember in just 5 seconds thinking of public high school. As I finish typing this response here, I have already thought of more. I'm just not sure where calling someone "home-schooled" is really all that different from the fact that kids with ego issues will call someone ANYTHING (even if it makes no sense whatsoever and/or is based on false, pre-conceived, narrow-minded opinions on a topic of which they absolutely nothing) in a nasty tone of voice, just to make themselves feel better.

As for college, I had been so fed up with public school from K to 12th, that I didn't attend a dorm-college; I went community college because I found the people to be REAL - no-one setting out to persecute someone else just for the sake of persecution. More on this later.

In regards to "it doesn't feel nice to be considered an outsider": I wasn't homeschooled; and I was an outsider all through public school, despite my attempts to fit in. The author is right, it doesn't feel nice to be considered an outsider. How about we ALL (teachers, parents, bus drivers - everyone) actually TEACH our children to be respectful and considerate of others, building a community rather than ripping a person down because they are a bit different than the others.

9. Call me old-fashioned, but a students’ classroom shouldn’t also be where they eat Fruit Loops and meat loaf (not at the same time I hope). It also shouldn’t be where the family gathers to watch American Idol or to play Wii. Students–from little ones to teens–deserve a learning-focused place to study. In modern society, we call them schools.

I had some pretty interesting teachers in public school who would probably encouraged the consumption of fruit loops and meat-loaf at the same time, in class, if they'd thought of it.

Homeschooling: a child, ANY child, is learning when they are at home. Period. It happens from the time they are in the womb and hearing mom and dad's voices - patterns are already being laid for language acquisition. Many children learn basic reading skills before going off to kindergarten. Home, by its very nature, IS a learning-focused place to not only study, but to live. Historically, school as we know them are extremely recent. Until mandatory education of small children was legislated, almost everyone learned at home; and schools were reserved for much older children and for the elite.

8. Homeschooling is selfish. According to this article in USA Today, students who get homeschooled are increasingly from wealthy and well-educated families. To take these (I’m assuming) high achieving students out of our schools is a disservice to our less fortunate public school kids. Poorer students with less literate parents are more reliant on peer support and motivation, and they  greatly benefit from the focus and commitment of their richer and higher achieving classmates.

I can only speak for my family. I am not wealthy, I am not elite. Well-educated? Depends on your definition of well-educated. My mother didn't finish college until after I did, and neither of her parents had a college education; my father has some college classes but is otherwise a low-man on the totem pole; and his parents did not have college educations; we all attended public school, as well as my sisters. I went on to earn two associates degrees, a bachelor's degree (that was like pulling teeth despite my top-notch public school education), and started a master's degree. I also have Montessori teacher training at primary (3-6 years) and elementary (6-12). I am looking forward to the adolescent training (12-18).

I spent 15 years in preschool and public school and didn't feel I was really learning anything until I started college early while in high school. I made good grades through public school, but my only role in the school's social system was to lay low and avoid trouble, when I wasn't setting out to make it. Those wealthy, elite children in school with me? They were the cause of most of the trouble, because they were better than everyone else and mommy/daddy could pay to get them out of the consequences.

I spent several years subbing in the public schools - top-notch schools, inner-city schools.

I'm not seeing the service to one another in the public schools.

7. God hates homeschooling. The study, done by the National Center for Education Statistics, notes that the most common reason parents gave as the most important was a desire to provide religious or moral instruction. To the homeschooling Believers out there, didn’t God say “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations”? Didn’t he command, “Ye shall be witnesses unto me”? From my side, to take your faithful children out of schools is to miss an opportunity to spread the grace, power and beauty of the Lord to the common people. (Personally I’m agnostic, but I’m just saying…)

These Biblical mandates are for those who are strong in their faith, not a small child still being trained in their faith.

And as many commenters on the original post have made clear: the government does NOT allow these children, however strong or weak may be their faith to spread grace, power, beauty, prayer, Biblical teaching, faith symbols or any of it.

So to have the religious child present or not, doesn't seem to make any difference. Except to the child who is constantly being attacked.

For us: I did not grow up particularly religious, though I had faith. Yet, I knew not to say much; and I would be surprised to see many of my classmates at church. It was a separation of school and church. So this point #7 simply holds NO water.

6. Homeschooling parent/teachers are arrogant to the point of lunacy. For real! My qualifications to teach English include a double major in English and education, two master’s degrees (education and journalism), a student teaching semester and multiple internship terms, real world experience as a writer, and years in the classroom dealing with different learning styles. So, first of all, homeschooling parent, you think you can teach English as well as me? Well, maybe you can. I’ll give you that. But there’s no way that you can teach English as well as me, and biology as well as a trained professional, and history… and Spanish… and art… and counsel for college as well as a school’s guidance counselor… and… and…

But I have an intimate knowledge of my son's academic strengths and weaknesses; I also have a wider variety of resources available to fill in any gaps in my own teaching.

My elementary teachers were generalists - they had their own strengths and weaknesses; one hopes these would balance out over the years. In my own experience, it really didn't. One teacher would presume what we'd learned from the previous teacher and would take us places for which we just weren't ready. I say "we" because the teaching was truly for the entire class - no wiggle room. If you really needed wiggle room, they provided LD rooms for that (Learning Differently) - some children were so much on the border they were constantly bouncing back and forth and this only eroded away what learning they were actually gaining.

By middle school, and continuing into high school, we had mostly specialized teachers. Great. Except that there were still times that a teacher would be teaching outside of their specialty - sometimes in very extreme cases. Long story, but I'll say this: it wasn't pretty.

At least a homeschooler can find the resources needed to ensure a quality education. There is flexibility in resources, in scheduling, in how to get from point A to point B, while the child is learning about fulfilling responsibilities in a tough situation. A bit different from just sailing through public school with everything handed to you: your schedule, your teachers, your expectations, your friends.

5. As a teacher, homeschooling kind of pisses me off. (That’s good enough for #5.)

I am a teacher. I homeschool my son. I know many teachers who have chosen to homeschool their own children. I can't speak for their reasons or situations - those are their stories to tell. I can speak for mine: I know my son could receive a good education from many of the area schools; or drive into our nearby city and send him to a Montessori school. Top-notch education. There's more to it.

As a homeschooler, general judgments kind of irritate me too. But I strive to be a bigger person than that. I strive to see both sides of the coin. And not use foul language.

4. Homeschooling could breed intolerance, and maybe even racism. Unless the student is being homeschooled at the  MTV Real World house, there’s probably only one race/sexuality/background in the room. How can a young person learn to appreciate other cultures if he or she doesn’t live among them?

Homeschooling could do a lot of things. So could public schools. Good and bad.

The nice thing about homeschooling is spending one's day out in the world. Yes, there are homeschoolers who hole up during the day and are afraid to be outside during school hours for fear of being erroneously reported for truancy - this is living in fear. I do not live in fear and I choose to raise my child not living in fear. We go out during the daytime because there is a WORLD out there. My son gets into conversations with the cutting counter associate at the fabric store; plans trips to the museums when the employees are available to answer questions and provide learning experiences that just aren't possible with a large group; join small groups of children or families on more outings than public school kids have field trips; and still have our evenings for family time, decent dinners, tae-kwon-do and other things that can only happen at those times.

We actually interact with people. My son does not have the same hardness and attitude I see in some of the public school kids. He's not always defending himself, so he is better able to be open to new friendships and interactions with a wider range of people. He doesn't see the "cliques" and the "gangs" so he just sees a person as a potential friend, without pre-conceived notions of who that person might be.

3. And don’t give me this “they still participate in activities with public school kids” garbage. Socialization in our grand multi-cultural experiment we call America is a process that takes more than an hour a day, a few times a week. Homeschooling, undoubtedly, leaves the child unprepared socially.

My son interacts with a wider range of people on a minute to minute basis than I ever did in public school. Period. I learned how to sneak notes during class as my socialization. My son wants to talk to someone? He finds the appropriate time and place and does so. I learned to be hard and defensive before letting someone into my little bubble. My son is learning to be open to new people and ideas. I learned to judge before knowing anything; my son is learning to explore an idea before forming an opinion. I learned that grudges can be held for years in some cases; and in other cases, you just move to a new school and start all over - no consequences at all. My son is learning there are consequences to choices, good and bad, and he is learning the art of true forgiveness.

Yes, historically, the public schools were established specifically for socialization. With our technological age and cars, even people way out in the country have greater opportunities for socialization than our early American counterparts. Homeschoolers are just as socialized as the public school children.

Studies have shown that homeschoolers are just as or more socially adjusted to the real world and better prepared for college level studies than their public school peers. One could use the argument about the wealthy kids being homeschooled (from #8 above), but that argument negates this one. Wealthy families allegedly have greater access to all sorts of social options, since their parents are highly educated and will be sure their children have the best of the best, so of course they will be socialized just fine. It's the non-wealthy kids we have to worry about. And the studies have taken care of evaluating the outcomes of these children.

2. Homeschooling parents are arrogant, Part 2. According to Henry Cate, who runs the Why Homeschool blog, many highly educated, high-income parents are “probably people who are a little bit more comfortable in taking risks” in choosing a college or line of work. “The attributes that facilitate that might also facilitate them being more comfortable with home-schooling.”

More comfortable taking risks with their child’s education? Gamble on, I don’t know, the Superbowl, not your child’s future.

Again, I can only speak for myself. I choose to homeschool my son because it is the safest gamble. Every choice I make as a parent is a gamble. Every single one. I know of one lady who sent her children to the local elementary school because it was so lovely, the teachers were fantastic, the children just blossomed there. But they went on to middle school and it got ugly. In high school, one of the children was shot at school (this was in the days "before" all the school violence was in the press). He died. She took a gamble. And lost her son.

Anything could happen while we are at home and I would wish afterward, "If only we hadn't been home at that time; he'd still be alive."

Getting into my car is a gamble. Staying home is a gamble. I'm talking immediate life-or-death risks.

Every single decision a parent makes is a gamble - is this the right thing to do? Right thing now? Right thing in the long-term? Or am I ruining my child for life?

Big picture: That gambling has a name: parenting.

Homeschooling parents are arrogant. They have weighed the options and actually made a conscious decision. Many public-school parents have done the exact same thing. They have weighed the options and made a conscious decision. I'm not going to bad-mouth them. As long as they have made a conscious decision, I choose to be respectful.

I only ask the same respect in return.

Parenting is a gamble; let's respect one another for the risks we ALL take.

1.  And finally… have you met someone homeschooled? Not to hate, but they do tend to be pretty geeky***.

*** Please see the comments for thoughts on the word ‘geeky.’ But, in general, to be geeky connotes a certain inability to integrate and communicate in diverse social situations. Which, I would argue, is a likely result of being educated in an environment without peers. It’s hard to get by in such a diverse world as ours! And the more people you can hang out with the more likely you are to succeed, both in work life and real life.

The homeschooled children I know are friendly and outgoing. The adults I've met who were homeschooled are friendly and outgoing. I can actually have a conversation with all of them (from children to adults) that has a sense of peace about it. It is SO hard to break through the barriers of some of the children who have developed a rough exterior, an attitude, a defensiveness against other children and especially adults.

I find the same result from children who attended Montessori schools.

I can relate to these people very easily; where I find it draining to work through the exteriors in those who have been hardened. It's rewarding when we do break through, but it is heart-breaking too - this hard exterior just isn't necessary. The constant come-backs and attitude just aren't necessary.

So I guess I don't see the geekiness - because I see a definite and clear ability to integrate and communicate in diverse social situations.

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Marriage - Sin - Huh!?

I wish I could so easily "leave the critic to worry out for himself". But how do we sit back and let so many people be harmed????





Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, January 13, 2012

Monopoly ADHD

We've been playing a LOT of games lately. Some we got for Christmas, others we pulled out because we're in game-mode - some new, some old...

We stopped at Kroger the day after Christmas - going to tae-kwon-do class near there anyway and hoped to get some Christmas candy on discount. Well, I was disappointed in the candy selection :( (it's ok, I found my candy selection at a different Kroger a week later - $4 bags of candy for $1!!!!) --- but we did pick up a Monopoloy card game for $2. I thought, "This could be good! We like Monopoly!"

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="168" caption="Here it is"]MONOPOLY DEAL Card Game[/caption]

[caption id="" align="alignright" width="240" caption="Image by 铁蛋骑士 via Flickr"]MONOPOLY DEAL[/caption]

Hm. Well. It is described as addictive. I guess if you're deprived of anything of interest.

Not to sound unduly harsh, but really? If you're going to have a game that plays THIS fast (it can be over in less than 5 minutes), let's have some strategy at least.

I don't know even know where to begin.

So I'll devolve for a moment: I like Monopoly - I like the length. If you're going to PLAY, then PLAY.  I like encouraging long attention spans in children. If you're going to have something with short hands (Mille Bornes can be fast! and it's far cooler), then do something where you're adding up points per hand - this builds some more strategy into it. And long-term patience with ups and downs - there are so many virtues learned and practiced.

Monopoly Deal is not like that. There are no points; the money counts for nothing in the end; there is no net value; I could go on....

You draw cards that are properties, money, action cards, houses and hotels.

You only need one house to place a hotel (and you leave the house - full sets required before placing houses). Ok, it's a fast-paced card game, things are going to change.

You draw two extra cards for passing Go (an action card).

How do you win?

You only need 3 complete property sets (and there are so many wild cards, it's unbelievable how fast you can put together sets of cards). That's it.

  • You don't need any particular properties - just 3 sets. Park Place and Boardwalk are barely harder to get than the Baltic set (especially with all the wilds).

  • Money on hand doesn't matter.

  • Net worth doesn't matter.

  • Debt doesn't matter.

  • Just three complete sets of properties.


Yeah. We changed the rules. You now need FOUR sets; with a HOUSE; and 20M cash on hand. It makes the game MUCH more interesting ---- and almost long enough to tolerate. Almost.

But here's the kicker: the ATTITUDE.

  • You don't just have a birthday and are blessed with money from other players. You *demand* birthday money on your birthday. Now, the card itself is worded fine -- it's the instructions that screw it up here.

  • Sly deal cards allow you to *steal* a property from another player. Cannot break up a full set.

  • You don't request/pay rent - it is forced. There's no landing on properties, so someone can "force" rent with the proper card played, at any time they like (as long as it is their turn).

  • There are debt collectors - it doesn't matter how well you play to assure you stay out of debt, you can get hit by a debt collector, again with the "force" to pay up (given that the original Monopoly did not allow debt at all - you were out of the game if you couldn't pay - society has changed). But then get this: if you have no cards to pay the debt with, you just don't pay, but you KEEP PLAYING. WHAT!? You can avoid debt like that!?!?!?!? I want to live in *that* society! (ok, I actually don't... think of the ramifications... things are bad enough in this one with the debt...)

  • Then there are "Just Say No" cards - you can play them on any of the action cards to stop an action against you (now the other player could have a "Just Say No" to stop the first "Just Say No" card. This tells me that when we tell our children to "Just Say No" to inappropriate offers of any kind, it can be over-ridden by the one making the demand. I think our society has become SO insensitive to not even realize how much these little things teach our sensitive young children.

  • Deal Breakers "steal" a complete set from another player - houses, hotels and all. Again, not "You inherited property!" or "Pay another player half the property value to purchase the entire set!" - this would still force the situation, but are not encouraging the wrong attitude.

  • At least "Forced Deal" is a swap with another player - the other player doesn't get to pick what they swap though. It just can't break up a full set.


Other action cards are harsh but at least not offensive to good morals.

It is fast; furious considering the attitude it promotes; and downright immoral. And to think that some people don't play the original Monopoly because of the capitalism it promotes. This game could be downright evil in that regard.

Yep. Monopoly ADHD. With an attitude.

To leave this on an up-beat: At least you can choose HOW to pay someone. While change is never given (if all you can pay is too much, you don't get change), you can choose to pay your debts with a combination of money and properties -- bartering of a sort!

I still think we're scrapping this one. Unless I decide to re-write the offensive cards - they're not BAD, it's just the WORDS that incite the ATTITUDE.  How about: It's your birthday! All players gift you to 2M! (not demanding it).

We've already re-written the rules. Why not re=write the cards?

Because it's a $2 game that never should have been bought. I should have known better to read the entire box first. Therefore I want to make up for my mistake.

:)
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, December 31, 2011

Redwall - when is it too much?

When do you know you've read too much Redwall?

When you're down to only needing Sable Queen, Rogue Crew, and Legend of Luke, but the resident child has read them *all*? And family discussions ensue about how things fit together, and who was Badger-mum for which abbesses -- and which names did Brian Jacques use twice for different characters, and... and ... and... ;)

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="75" caption="Image via Wikipedia"]Mariel of Redwall[/caption]

When you start feeling a special aversion to anything that sounds remotely like Skilly-n-Duff?

When nothing on your plate at dinner time remotely compares to the delicious descriptions of the delectable dainties found in Redwall?

When you strive (and succeed!) to speak only in riddles or songs?

When you always have a smile on?

When you start saying "Burr Okie!" or "Burr Oi!" instead of "Of course!"?

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="75" caption="Image via Wikipedia"]Outcast of Redwall[/caption]

Or when you tease each other with the words, "You bottomless stomach!" to which the recipient responds, "I'm not rabbit! I'm a hare! Wot, wot!"

When you start to believe that good really *does* triumph over evil?

When this booklet just looks too cool:

Redwall Map & Riddler



Enhanced by ZemantaWhat about you and your family? What books have you read that have changed your life in unexpected, awkward or amusing ways?


I bet you have at least one, wot-wot!


;)